<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Service (Flickr) vs Software (host your own)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theleagueofpaul.com/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theleagueofpaul.com/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/</link>
	<description>Blog of Paul (&#34;Aeoth&#34;) Jenkins, forging the way into awesomeness through Android and WPF/.NET dev</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.theleagueofpaul.com/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5380</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeoth.net/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/#comment-5380</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re absolutely right, those sort of little things like being able to upload from XYZ app automagically by default makes it a lot more inviting to use those services - Live Photo Gallery and Lightroom in particular (since I use those two a fair bit)....

I suppose that&#039;s another part I didn&#039;t cover, Flickr&#039;s API is pretty good, but embedding it into your website adds a lot of overheads..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right, those sort of little things like being able to upload from XYZ app automagically by default makes it a lot more inviting to use those services &#8211; Live Photo Gallery and Lightroom in particular (since I use those two a fair bit)&#8230;.</p>
<p>I suppose that&#8217;s another part I didn&#8217;t cover, Flickr&#8217;s API is pretty good, but embedding it into your website adds a lot of overheads..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshnunn</title>
		<link>http://www.theleagueofpaul.com/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/comment-page-1/#comment-5379</link>
		<dc:creator>joshnunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeoth.net/blog/2008/12/05/service-flickr-vs-software-host-your-own/#comment-5379</guid>
		<description>I had the same issue when I started taking more photos. I had a free Flickr account, and webhosting and really wanted to host my own photos.

What it came down to was the workflow: with a paid Flickr account I could upload using a nice piece of software (or from my phone or email or whatever) tag it, permission it and group it. Then using tan tan noodles&#039; Flickr Photo Album plugin (http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/photo-album/) could quickly add one of my Flickr photos to a post and link it to an album &quot;hosted&quot; on my site, or straight back to Flickr.

It was a no-brainer when I looked at the under-developed state of the open source or free alternatives. And if I understand your wish-list, Flickr offers all those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same issue when I started taking more photos. I had a free Flickr account, and webhosting and really wanted to host my own photos.</p>
<p>What it came down to was the workflow: with a paid Flickr account I could upload using a nice piece of software (or from my phone or email or whatever) tag it, permission it and group it. Then using tan tan noodles&#8217; Flickr Photo Album plugin (<a href="http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/photo-album/" rel="nofollow">http://tantannoodles.com/toolkit/photo-album/</a>) could quickly add one of my Flickr photos to a post and link it to an album &#8220;hosted&#8221; on my site, or straight back to Flickr.</p>
<p>It was a no-brainer when I looked at the under-developed state of the open source or free alternatives. And if I understand your wish-list, Flickr offers all those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
